Generalizations of the Familywise Error Rate
نویسندگان
چکیده
Consider the problem of simultaneously testing null hypotheses H1, . . . ,Hs. The usual approach to dealing with the multiplicity problem is to restrict attention to procedures that control the familywise error rate (FWER), the probability of even one false rejection. In many applications, particularly if s is large, one might be willing to tolerate more than one false rejection provided the number of such cases is controlled, thereby increasing the ability of the procedure to detect false null hypotheses. This suggests replacing control of the FWER by controlling the probability of k or more false rejections, which we call the k-FWER. We derive both single-step and stepdown procedures that control the k-FWER, without making any assumptions concerning the dependence structure of the p-values of the individual tests. In particular, we derive a stepdown procedure that is quite simple to apply, and prove that it cannot be improved without violation of control of the k-FWER. We also consider the false discovery proportion (FDP) defined by the number of false rejections divided by the total number of rejections (defined to be 0 if there are no rejections). The false discovery rate proposed by Benjamini and Hochberg [J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57 (1995) 289–300] controls E(FDP). Here, we construct methods such that, for any γ and α, P{FDP > γ} ≤ α. Two stepdown methods are proposed. The first holds under mild conditions on the dependence structure of pvalues, while the second is more conservative but holds without any dependence assumptions.
منابع مشابه
Stepup Procedures for Control of Generalizations of the Familywise Error Rate by Joseph P. Romano
The Annals of Statistics 2006, Vol. 0, No. 00, 1–26 DOI: 10.1214/009053606000000461 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2006 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 43 43 STEPUP PROCEDURES FOR CONTRO...
متن کاملStepup Procedures for Control of Generalizations of the Familywise Error Rate
Consider the multiple testing problem of testing null hypotheses H1, . . . ,Hs. A classical approach to dealing with the multiplicity problem is to restrict attention to procedures that control the familywise error rate (FWER), the probability of even one false rejection. But if s is large, control of the FWER is so stringent that the ability of a procedure that controls the FWER to detect fals...
متن کاملA note on adaptive Bonferroni and Holm procedures under dependence
Hochberg & Benjamini (1990) first presented adaptive procedures for controlling familywise error rate. However, until now, it has not been proved that these procedures control the familywise error rate. We introduce a simplified version of Hochberg & Benjamini’s adaptive Bonferroni and Holm procedures. Assuming a conditional dependence model, we prove that the former procedure controls the fami...
متن کاملPer Family or Familywise Type I Error Control: "Eether, Eyether, Neether, Nyther, Let's Call the Whole Thing Off!"
Frane (2015) pointed out the difference between per-family and familywise Type I error control and how different multiple comparison procedures control one method but not necessarily the other. He then went on to demonstrate in the context of a two group multivariate design containing different numbers of dependent variables and correlations between variables how the per-family rate inflates be...
متن کاملPost Hoc Tests
Familywise Error Familywise error (FWE) is also known as alpha inflation or cumulative Type I error. Familywise error represents the probability that any one of a set of comparisons or significance tests is a Type I error. As more tests are conducted, the likelihood that one or more are significant just due to chance (Type I error) increases. One can estimate familywise error with the following...
متن کامل